California Senate Bill 1129, Castro Valley, and You

Featured Story
7

On April 9, the California Senate Governance and Finance Committee will have a hearing on  California Senate Bill 1129. We’ve mentioned this bill before, but its passage could be hugely beneficial to Castro Valley, and to the town square proposal.

The 2012 dissolution of the California redevelopment agencies has been messy, and unfortunately in Castro Valley the Daughtrey Building can practically serve as a case study on the problems with the dissolution. Senate Bill 1129 aims to mitigate many of the problems caused by the dissolution process. Section (4) is the key part that is relevant to a public use of a redevelopment property:

(4) Existing law requires a city, county, or city and county that wishes to retain any properties or other assets for future redevelopment activities, funded from its own funds and under its own auspices, to reach a compensation agreement with the other taxing entities to provide payments to them in proportion to their shares of the base property tax for the value of the property retained, as specified.

This bill would specify that these provisions do not apply to the disposition of properties pursuant to a long-range property management plan.

In short: you don’t have to pay twice if you are holding on to a redevelopment property for public use. Transferring the property from one public agency to another could be done for a nominal fee. In practice, this could make it significantly easier for Alameda County to hold on to the Daughtrey Building for a public use . . . such as a town square.

So what can you do? Today, Wednesday, April 2, you can email Brian Weinberger (Brian.Weinberger@sen.ca.gov), the analyst who is putting together the packet for the senators on the committee. Emails to him supporting SB 1129 will show that there is public interest in the bill, and public benefit from the bill. Next, before the hearing on April 9, contact State Senator Ellen Corbett, whose district includes Castro Valley, and is one of the co-authors of this bill. Send her a letter (or an email!), telling her why you support it, and why you think it can help Castro Valley. Then send letters to the members of the Senate Governance and Finance Committee. This bill is heavy on policy, and a quick read of it doesn’t give you a broad sense of how it can help the people and communities of California. Writing to the legislators about why you support it and how it can help Castro Valley will help them put a face on it, which is crucial for its passage.

(If you want more background and policy analysis, see this post from the League of California Cities on Senate Bill 1129 and other assembly bills aimed at cleaning up the mess left behind by redevelopment dissolution.)

Hi Folks,
This is very important legislation for the future of CV and the rest of the Unincorporated Area.
Bob Swanson

Bob,

Thank you for your comment. We realize that this is important legislation, but we are struggling a bit in communicating that to CV residents. I appreciate your highlighting of it!

You must be new to Castro Valley. You will not attract many residents to setting up a town square. This is the definition of bedroom community. Good luck trying….This comes up every 5 to 10 years.

Teresa,

I am fairly new to Castro Valley, and our group includes both recent residents (i.e. they have moved here since the most recent attempt at incorporation) and lifelong residents. Many of the residents we have talked to are interested in the possibility of trying something new in the downtown area, so perhaps attitudes are shifting.

Hi Teresa,
Thanks for visiting castrovalleymatters.org, we appreciate your input.
We can’t remember any time a town square was proposed downtown before now. And many of us are life long residents of CV. Can you refresh our memory when a town square was proposed in the past?

We have visited other self proclaimed “bedroom communities” that have an active and thriving downtown with very nice town squares as a centerpiece, and thought Castro Valley deserved one too.

Thank you CVM participants for your work on this important issue. Unfortunately, I am reading this today (4/9) and didn’t get to write the above committee members, but will do my best to participate in the future. I too think it is time to start creating a downtown that I want to visit rather driving to some other city and spending my money there.

Thank you for your support! The good news (or bad, depending on your perspective) is that there are always more letters to write! The bill passed the committee and is headed to appropriations; we will keep Castro Valley informed as it progresses.

Governance
Supervisors to hear proposal for incorporation fiscal analysis

The Alameda County Board of Supervisors Unincorporated Services Committee meets on Wednesday, April 27 at 6:00 pm to hear from the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) about a proposed fiscal analysis of the feasibility of incorporating Castro Valley and the other Alameda County unincorporated communities.

Featured Story
1
Walking in Castro Valley: “She hit me and didn’t stop”

For the last few years, I have been a committed pedestrian, taking time to walk, exercise my husky Juneau and avoiding driving for nearby errands.

Governance
Crawford to resign from MAC, be appointed to Alameda County Planning Commission

Supervisor Nate Miley has nominated current Castro Valley Municipal Council (MAC) Chair Marc Crawford to serve on the Alameda County Planning Commission, according to the agenda posted for Tuesday’s Board of Supervisors meeting. Crawford’s resignation from the MAC is also included on the agenda. The Planning Commission is made up …