1960 Castro Valley General Plan – What Might Have Been

Education
11

So, what exactly is a “General Plan?” According to the Alameda County Planning Department, it is:

A General Plan is a long range policy document approved by the Board of Supervisors to guide physical, economic, and environmental growth. State law requires the County to have a General Plan which contains seven elements: Land Use; Circulation; Housing; Open Space; Conservation; Safety and Noise. The plan expresses the County’s vision for the future and is the roadmap for achieving the community’s desired quality of life. It is an assessment of current and future needs, and the resources needed to implement the goals and policies established. As the needs of the County change, the Planning Department with citizen comment and input makes recommendations to the Board of Supervisors to reflect the direction for the future and to update the General Plan.

The Castro Valley General Plan was last updated in 2010, and it is a very detailed plan. It took over seven years of community meetings an input to craft the plan meant to guide our development for the next 20 years.  It was not, however the first attempt at creating a plan and vision for the future of our town.  Looking back at “what might have been” can be an enlightening experience. Most incorporated cities have ongoing reviews of their General Plans, and institute “course corrections” as neceessary. As an Unincorporated Area, we miss out on that, and Castro Valley is left to drift on the whims of the current Supervisor and elected CVUSD Board members.

Let’s review our grand plans of 1960.

The original Castro Valley General Plan was written in 1960, and formally adopted by the BOS on February 27, 1961.  It generally made projections about what the town would be like and need in 1980.  At the time, the population of Castro Valley was 38,700, and the report predicted a 1980 population of as many as 76,000.  Two things that the plan reviewed in great detail were the schools, and public facilities.

The Original 1960 Master Plan for Castro Valley
The Original 1960 Master Plan for Castro Valley

Lets look at the grand plans envisioned for our Schools.  At the time, there were 19 schools in the planning area serving approximately 9,900 students.

  • Castro Valley School District had Sydney, Clifton, Parsons, Chabot, Stanton, Norbridge, Proctor, Redwood, Marshall, Vannoy and Castro Valley Elementary Schools, and A.B. Morris and Earl Warren Jr. High Schools
  • Independent Elementary was part of the Independent School District
  • San Lorenzo School District had Fairmont Terrace and El Portal Elementary Schools
  • Hayward Elementary School District had Laurel and Baywood Elementary Schools, and Strobridge Jr. High
  • Castro Valley High School belonged to the Hayward Union High School District (and would remain there until the District was dissolved in 1963).
Projected School, Park and Library Needs by 1980
Projected School, Park and Library Needs by 1980

The plan projected student enrollment to exceed 20,000 by 1980 and called for increasing the school count to 29 by adding ten new schools to the area including:

  • Two new K-3 schools located West of Redwood Rd, and North of the High School
  • One new K-3 school located West of Castro Valley Elementary
  • One new K-6 Elementary School near Earl Warren Jr. High (now Creekside MS)
  • Two new K-6 Elementary Schools, one in Cull Canyon and one in Crow Canyon
  • One new K-6 Elementary School West of Redwood Rd, and just South of Grove Way.
  • Two new Jr High Schools, one North of Stanton Elementary and one where Canyon MS now stands
  • One new High School near the intersection of Castro Valley Blvd and Crow Canyon Road

Additionally, the plan called for a new Junior College to be built on Lake Chabot Road, using land from the former Nike missile site.

In actuality, Castro Valley enrollment went into a steep decline eventually bottoming out in the mid-1980’s at around 4400 students.  In 2014, we now have 13 conventional schools within the General Plan Area serving approximately 9500 students:

  • Nine Elementary, two Middle and one High School in CVUSD
  • One Elementary School in HUSD

Many of our school facilities from 1960 have been put to other uses:

  • Baywood, Sydney and Parsons Elementary schools as well as A.B. Morris Jr. High were all closed and the land redeveloped into new housing.
  • Norbridge Elementary was closed and sold to the BART district as part of the new Castro Valley station
  • Laurel, El Portal and Fairmont Terrace Elementary schools were closed, but the sites have been leased to private schools
  • Strobridge Jr. High was converted to an Elementary School
  • Canyon High School was built, but converted to a middle school in the 1970’s
  • Earl Warren Jr. High was closed in the 1970’s, but reopened in 1996 as Creekside Middle School
  • Clifton Elementary was closed, but reopened as Redwood Continuation High School
  • Redwood Elementary was closed, but reopened and the site is now used as Alma Preschool, the Castro Valley Adult School and the CVUSD District Office.
This forlorn "School Xing" painted on Wilbeam Ave. next to the BART station parking lot is all that remains of Norbridge Elementary School
This forlorn “School Xing” painted on Wilbeam Ave. next to the BART station parking lot is all that remains of Norbridge Elementary School

The plan also called for a nine acre “Cultural Civic Center” to be built.  The new library on Redwood Rd was to be the first building built in this complex planned to fill the West side of Redwood Road from Jamison Way to Lorena Avenue.  A “Cultural Complex” would occupy the Northern end of the center and include the library, a small museum/art gallery, a YMCA or Boys Club, and meeting halls for Fraternal Groups. The Southern end of the Center would contain a branch government administration building (or city hall,) a post office, chamber of commerce building, and rentable space for community groups such as the Red Cross and the Boy and Girl Scouts.  There was also to be a 20 acre park adjacent to the site, “or in the general vicinity.”

The Proposed Location of the Castro Valley Cultural-Civic Center and Park
The Proposed Location of the Castro Valley Cultural-Civic Center and Park

As the plan stated “…regardless of whether the area incorporates, annexes or remains unincorporated, a local administration building should be located in the Cultural-Civic Center to assist in serving the 1980 community of 72,000 persons.”

54 years later in 2014, we can see the only thing to come of that grand proposal is the now vacant library building.

According to the Alameda County Community Development Agency, the next County plan up for rewrite is the long neglected and woefully out of date 1993 Castro Valley Downtown Specific Plan -although this rewrite has not yet started, and funding has not yet been allocated.  Considering the last rewrite of our General Plan took over seven years to complete, we may not see the Downtown Specific Plan revised until 2020.  Looking back at what “might have been” if we had stuck to, and regularly revised our 1960 plan should inspire the County to review and revise all of their General and Specific Plans on a more frequent and reliable cycles.

The 1960 Castro Valley General Plan was truly visionary. Such documents usually are, but alas, they are rarely implemented. As one of my urban planning professors once remarked (with a nod to Alexander Pope): “To plan is human; to implement, divine.

Also, the fact that the “school xing” and crosswalk are still on Wilbeam despite the fact that the school itself was demolished in the mid-1990’s reflects the need for more regular street repaving and maintenance in Castro Valley. But that’s a topic for a different post…

Thanks for a great write up, Michael! Short term planning seems to close a great many doors for us in CV.

I know that General and Specific plans can take a lot of effort to create.

Are there any examples from CV’s history where a big idea from one of these plans was successfully implemented?

How does County implementation of plans compare to other local cities? Does the nature of our local governance frustrate the implementation of planning tools like this?

I’ll explore that in a future post. Off the top of my head, here are a few “implemented” grand ideas from past plans. Cull Canyon Dam and Lake, Canyon High School, the Canoe sign, and the streetscape.

I leave it up to you to judge the “successfulness” of the implementation on those big ideas-

Not sure what impact a plan has. Here in Fairview we have a specific plan that prohibits developments on top of ridges. The Planning Commission approves such developments anyway. The specific plan also sets minimum standards for setbacks but they are not enforced. Would you like a writeup of the development on Tract 6102?

Agreed. The CV MAC rigorously bases its reccomendations on the CV General Plan, and the CV Downtown Specific Plan, but those reccomendations are often set aside (or ignored) when the projects reach the BZA and Planning Commission.

Be interesting to gauge the reaction of the general (thinking) population of our fair town should they become aware of this. Could it be the catalyst to finally incorporating Castro Valley (along with the perception of MAC acting as an ersatz City Council)?

I was new to participation in local government and I felt honored to be appointed by then Supervisor Joe Bort to the General Plan update in 1985.

It was a learning experience. One thing I learned was that the folks who take the time to attend community planning meetings are the folks who formulate the plans.

The folks who complain; generally are the folks who don’t show up.
Bob Swanson

Often the folks who don’t participate are the folks who complain but I find more and more the folks complaining are the folks who actively participated in the process. They complain the loudest because the plans are NOT being followed. It think this is a consistent opinion being expressed in the EALI forums. By the way Bob your historical perspective on events in very valuable to the community. I always appreciate the historical perspective you are able to provide as local issues are discussed.

The links to the 1960 General Plan are broken–if you are still monitoring this, I would like to get a copy. Thanks

Community
The Right to a Smoke-Free Environment

In Castro Valley, 27% of homes are considered multi-unit housing and are part of the 15,367 multi-unit housing homes in Unincorporated Alameda County that are at risk of being exposed to secondhand smoke. Castro Valley is part of Unincorporated Alameda County, where a resident’s best bet for living in a …

Featured Story
1
Walking in Castro Valley: “She hit me and didn’t stop”

For the last few years, I have been a committed pedestrian, taking time to walk, exercise my husky Juneau and avoiding driving for nearby errands.

This is a map of the location of Castro Valley Lumber
Community
6
Chick-fil-A next to Burger Island? Where’s the beef?

When you consider how this location is a gateway to this community, how poorly conceived this intersection is, and the increasing traffic along 580, it is fair to question the wisdom of placing a new drive-thru restaurant here.